CSUSM should require students returning to campus in the fall to be vaccinated
April 7, 2021
Since the COVID-19 vaccine has become gradually available in California, universities, including CSUSM, are planning to open in-person instruction for the new academic year.
However, there are questions about the university’s planning of in-person transition after an academic year of virtual instruction, such as if schools will require students to be vaccinated before returning to campus.
The university should mandate a vaccine requirement for students returning to campus for in-person instruction to reduce the probability of COVID-19 outbreaks on campus. Most students want an normal in-person college experience like they had in the pre-pandemic era, making vaccine requirements necessary to keep everyone safe.
Rutgers became the first university to require students returning to campus to be vaccinated. But for universities that decide to require vaccines, there may be legal challenges in the future because the vaccine has only been emergency approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Those who oppose universities mandating COVID-19 vaccines may claim that because of the vaccines’ emergency approval, they are not safe and thus should not be required for students.
COVID-19 vaccines are only studied for large clinical trials prior to the FDA’s emergency’s approval and it is difficult to have evidence about the vaccine being effective against the newest strain of the virus.
Researchers estimated the vaccines may last a minimum of three months. Since there is a limit of data for current vaccines recently, some individuals are wary about the legitimacy of the emergency approved vaccines’ length of immunity against the COVID-19 disease.
Since there are questions about universities’ vaccine mandate requirements for students to return to campus next fall, universities have the right to impose mandates for students obtaining their vaccine and show vaccination proof prior to returning to in-person instruction.
Furthermore, universities’ have high chances of winning the legal battle of upholding their COVID-19 vaccine requirement due to it being necessary for protecting the public health of the community.
Even though there were early concerns about an emergency approved vaccine against the COVID-19 virus, the FDA made their decision because time is the enemy for the vaccines against COVID-19 virus’s new mutant strains. Early studies of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines showed promising results against various mutant strains of virus.
Vaccinated students can reduce the chances of in-campus outbreaks in the winter season of the fall semester.
CSUSM needs to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for students to enjoy college experience while reducing the likelihood of outbreaks on campus next fall.
Richard Ho is a staff writer for The Cougar Chronicle. He is currently a junior computer science major and mathematics minor. Richard is considering applying to graduate school with the emphasis of artificial intelligence next year. During his free time, he enjoys running outside early in the morning and being with his family.
Crystal • May 11, 2021 at 7:00 am
As a parent. I do not want my child taking this covid vaccine. It is not FDA-approved and it is an experimental shot. We are not even a year out and have not seen full effects of what this shot will do to our children. It is not right to require or mandate that our kids get this vaccine to go to college. It should be People’s Choice. Vaccinated people shouldn’t worry about unvaccinated if the shot works. Besides it’s supposed to only work for 3 months if it truly works at all. There are too many complications from the shot that have been documented and I’m sure many that have not been. I might have to change where my son attends this fall if they are going to mandate this. Hope San Marcos thinks of others who do not wish to put experimental drugs in their bodies.
Chris Kydd • Apr 8, 2021 at 6:02 pm
Dear Author
Thank you for sharing your opinion, and it’s good thing you label this as opinion. As a staff writer for the paper you are likely guided by the cannons of good journalism, so you know that unsubstantiated claims like “the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines showed promising results against various mutant strains of virus” can be dangerous when presented as fact.
From one truth-seeking, newspaper-reading human being to another: please don’t believe the hype. Question everything and be a filter of mistruth and propaganda. The vaccine issue aside, it’s a journalists’ job to do just that.
Thanks for listening.
Warmly
Chris Kydd
Human Being